Sump's first canned cold-brew release, described in a spring 2019 Pull & Pour review, used a coffee from Huila, Colombia. The St. Louis roaster presented the format as a seasonal offering whose underlying coffee could change. That distinction matters when reading an old review: a can with the same brand name years later may contain a different origin, process or recipe.
The reviewer reported a smooth texture alongside subtle berry impressions, tomato-like acidity and a floral finish. These descriptors make the account more specific than a generic promise of low acidity or chocolate flavor. The source also stated that the reviewed product contained coffee and water without additional ingredients. Its complexity reminded the reviewer of Japanese-style iced coffee, but that comparison describes the drinking experience; it does not establish that the canned product was brewed by that method.
The original review treated the can as an occasional premium purchase because its then-current price was high relative to everyday cold brew. For a present-day comparison, calculate cost per serving from an actual listing and read the current ingredient and storage labels. Packaging, manufacturing arrangements and seasonal coffees can change. The archived sensory account is useful for understanding Sump's approach at the time, but it is not evidence of current stock, shelf life or the condition of a particular can.

The conversation
A good question can make a better brew.