The source discusses arabica in Myanmar's northern uplands and robusta in lower southern areas. It also describes smallholder production and efforts to improve cultivation and processing. Those are useful parts of an origin introduction, while its broad statements about specialty-market acceptance should not be treated as a lasting quality verdict.
For a current coffee, establish the producer, location, harvest and process. A natural-process lot and another preparation can show quite different characteristics, and a dark-roast description does not identify every way the coffee can be used. The source's earthy or heavy-bodied tasting language belongs to its examples rather than the entire country's crop.
Keep older production shares and political or aid-program accounts attached to their dates. They do not by themselves confirm today's availability, partnerships or handling conditions. A specific, traceable offering can be evaluated with a measured recipe and the roaster's information. This researched profile does not replace that evidence with a generalized prediction about what Myanmar coffee must taste like.
The conversation
A good question can make a better brew.