A clean cup is not simply a pale-looking drink or a synonym for washed processing. In CoffeeBox's discussion, the term brings together the absence of distracting defects, distinguishable sensory structure and a finish that remains coherent. Personal preference still matters: an intense coffee can be clearly expressed, while a quieter one can be dull without being defective.
The source argues that controlled fermentation can fit this broader idea of cleanliness. Instead of judging only whether a coffee has wine-like or tropical aromas, consider how those aromas interact with sweetness, acidity and body. A forceful fragrance is not a substitute for a balanced cup, and unusual flavour alone does not establish a processing fault.
Taste the brew at more than one temperature and keep aroma, texture and finish as separate observations. Describe the actual sensation rather than assigning quality solely from a processing label. Cleanliness in a sensory review is also distinct from laboratory food-safety testing; the absence of an unpleasant taste cannot verify the safety or microbiology of a coffee.

The conversation
A good question can make a better brew.